Please click to visit English Version Newsletter   

SuzhouLegal

 

                                       

建纬(苏州)律师事务所     

           

Newsletter 苏州外企法律通讯

     

CITY DEVELOPMENT (SUZHOU) LAW FIRM

                                                                                                     

WWW.SUZHOULEGAL.COM

         

 如您不能正常浏览,请点击此处

 

2011年10月第10期  Issue 10,October 2011

Suzhoulegal Newsletter, a legal newsletter  published by Shanghai City Development (Suzhou) Law Firm, contains useful legal updates and information for foreign invested companies in Suzhou and greater areas.

SuzhouLegal is a branch of City Development Law Firm, Suzhou and specializes in providing services and assistance to foreign invested companies in the Suzhou and the surrounding areas. For detailed information about our services please visit our website www.suzhoulegal.com  We offer all subscribers to our Newsletter one free legal consultation with our foreign legal service team. To arrange this please contact one of our team by phone or email and we will be happy to make an appointment for you or visit you at your workplace.

《苏州外企法律通讯》是由上海建纬(苏州)律师事务所主编的中英文电子通讯,旨在为苏州中外企业定期提供最新法律法规及相关信息。

Suzhoulegal是建纬(苏州)律师事务所涉外法律服务中心,专为苏州及周边地区外资公司提供法律服务和帮助。如需更多服务信息,请您访问我们的网站:www.suzhoulegal.com 我们可以为所有订阅我们通讯的客户提供一次免费法律咨询服务。如您有此需要,请您电话或电邮联系我们,我们很高兴能为您预约时间,或到贵公司拜访

特写文章
企业如何裁员
最新法律法规
 

最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国企业破产法》若干问题的规定(一)

关于实施《中华人民共和国知识产权海关保护条例》第九条和第十一条的规定有关事项的公告

《民事诉讼法修正案》 公开征求意见

特写文章

                                     企业如何裁员

    为应对当前严峻的经济形势,很多企业开始寻求裁员的方式度过难关。我们的一些客户也频频向我们表达了这方面的愿望。本期通讯我们将对中国劳动法律法规中有关裁员的规定予以总结介绍并分享给大家。相信这一主题能适用于多数企业并为大家总结出一些可能性的裁员方案。

    从我们的实务经验来看,至少有两种典型的裁员方案可供企业选择:(1)经济性裁员;(2)与员工协商一致的裁员。以下我们将围绕这两种方案予以分析介绍。

1. 经济性裁员
    在中国劳动法当中,当企业需要裁减一定规模员工时,必须要遵照法律规定履行一些特殊的程序和要求,这种裁员方式我们称之为经济性裁员。具体来讲,适用经济性裁员的情形是指:企业需要裁员二十人以上或者裁员不足二十人但占企业职工总数百分之十以上的。经济性裁员除了有法定人数要求外,企业的裁员理由也必须符合法律规定,根据相关规定,适用经济性裁员的法定理由包括:  
   (1)用人单位生产经营发生严重困难的;
   (2)因劳动合同订立时所依据的客观经济情况发生重大变化,致使劳动合同无法履行的。
    当企业面对以上两种情况中的一种时即可通过经济性裁员的方式进行裁员,当然进行经济性裁员必须履行相关的法定程序要求,这又包括以下:
   (1) 提前三十日向工会或者全体职工说明情况,并提供有关生产经营状况的资料;
   (2) 准备裁员方案,方案内容包括裁员名单、裁员时间、裁员的具体实施计划。需要指出的是裁员方案必须提交工会或者全体职工讨论并提取职工的意见;
   (3) 将裁员方案和员工的反馈意见向园区劳动行政部门报告以期获得批准。
   (4) 当获得相关劳动行政部门的批准之后,企业才可以裁员。经济性裁员亦要求企业根据法律规定支付相应的经济补偿金;

    有关经济补偿金或称裁员金的支付标准问题,中国劳动法律规定经济补偿按劳动者在本单位工作的年限计算,每满一年支付一个月工资的标准向劳动者支付。六个月以上不满一年的,按一年计算;不满六个月的,向劳动者支付半个月工资的经济补偿。以上所称月工资是指劳动者解除合同前十二个月的月平均工资。
    另外需要指出的是,中国劳动法律对于某些员工存在某些特殊性的保护规定,这些规定亦适用于当企业面临经营困难需寻求经济性裁员的情形。换句话说,这些员工不适用于企业的经济性裁员。具体来讲,一个企业的经济性裁员计划不得包含以下人员:
   (一)从事接触职业病危害作业的劳动者未进行离岗前职业健康检查,或者疑似职业病病人在诊断或者医学观察期间的;
   (二)在本单位患职业病或者因工负伤并被确认丧失或者部分丧失劳动能力的;
   (三)患病或者非因工负伤,在规定的医疗期内的;
   (四)女职工在孕期、产期、哺乳期的;
   (五)在本单位连续工作满十五年,且距法定退休年龄不足五年的;
   最后,裁减人员时,法律规定应当优先留用下列人员:
   (一)与本单位订立较长期限的固定期限劳动合同的;
   (二)与本单位订立无固定期限劳动合同的;
   (三)家庭无其他就业人员,有需要扶养的老人或者未成年人的。

2. 与员工协商一致的裁员
    当面临经营困境时,除了以上方案,企业还可选择另一种裁员方案,那就是进行单独或者集体性的员工协商,在协商一致的基础上达到裁员目的。
    当企业通过协商的方式与员工就裁员问题达成一致以后,企业仍需支付被裁减员工经济补偿金或称辞退金,补偿金的具体数额根据企业与员工协商一致的标准支付。协商一致就意味着当员工拒绝企业的补偿方案时,企业就需做好支付更高补偿金的心理准备。以上的前提是企业能够与员工就辞退问题达成一致,如果员工拒绝被辞退,那么事情就更加复杂了。在这种情况下,很多企业可能会选择坚持裁员,但需要指出的是此种情况下的裁员企业可能需要支付法定经济补偿金两倍的赔偿金,当然如果企业权衡之后觉得可行,此裁员方案也未尝不可。
    因此,企业裁员所面临的最坏结果就出现了,那就是一方面企业不符合经济性裁员的要求,进而企业也无法与员工进行协商以解除劳动合同,最终选择单方解除劳动合同以实现裁员目标。在这种最坏结果发生时,企业要么碰运气(因为此时员工依然有要求企业继续履行劳动合同的权利),要么承担经济补偿金两倍的赔偿责任(当员工不要求企业继续履行劳动合同时)。

    为了清晰地展示以上所述的几种裁员方案的利弊,以下即以简表的方式呈现给大家,以使大家对于可选择的裁员方案及经济补偿金的支付情况等有更清晰的认识:
 

裁员方案

经济补偿金支付方案

赔偿金支付

备注

经济性裁员方案

法定标准:员工入职每满一年支付一个月的工资;

不适用

申请不一定获得批准并且所要经历的法定程序繁琐费时;

与员工协商一致的裁员方案

不涉及经济补偿金的法定支付标准,经济补偿金的支付标准取决于协商一致的数额;

不适用

如果员工拒绝企业一开始的支付方案,可能导致企业需要支付高额的协议补偿金;

单方解除方案

不适用

法定经济补偿金两倍的赔偿金;

员工有法定权利要求企业继续履行劳动合同。

    另外,需要提请大家注意的是,如果企业考虑裁减的是一线员工,除了以上方案,通常还有一些其他的办法可行,比如完全取消他们的加班时间,因为对于一线员工来讲,他们很大程度上依靠加班工资过活,当没有加班时间时,他们也就会选择自愿离开企业了。相反,如果要裁减的是办公室人员,则此方法是行不通的。
以上就是本期法律通讯的主要内容。

最新法律法规

最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国企业破产法》若干问题的规定(一)

发布单位:最高人民法院

发布文号:法解(2011) 22号

 

发布日期:2011-09-09

实施日期:2011-09-26

全文链接:http://www.court.gov.cn/qwfb/sfjs/201109/t20110926_165692.htm

   《中华人民共和国企业破产法》自2007年6月1日施行以后,有的法院尚未充分认识到企业破产法在调整市场经济中的重要作用及各方面原因,对于申请人提出的符合法律规定的受理破产案件条件的申请, 以种种理由不予立案。因此,一些企业未经法定程序依法退市,严重扰乱了市场经济秩序。为了尽快扭转这种不正常局面,充分发挥企业破产法的应有作用,最高人民法院首先从法院系统内部着力,推动破产案件的受理,制定了破产 法司法解释(一)。
    该解释进一步明确破产申请标准及提供申请人诉讼复审救济程序,具体规定包括:
    一、债务人不能清偿到期债务并且具有下列情形之一的,人民法院应当认定债务人具备破产原因: 债务人不能清偿到期债务并且资产不足以清偿全部债务或明显缺乏清偿能力。
    二、人民法院应当认定债务人不能清偿到期债务如果债权债务关系依法成立、债务履行期限已经届满或债务人未完全清偿债务。
    三、即便债务人账面资产虽大于负债,但存在下列情形之一的,人民法院应当认定其明显缺乏清偿能力如果下列情况之一存在:
   (一)因资金严重不足或者财产不能变现等原因,无法清偿债务;
   (二)法定代表人下落不明且无其他人员负责管理财产,无法清偿债务;
   (三)经人民法院强制执行,无法清偿债务;
   (四)长期亏损且经营扭亏困难,无法清偿债务;
   (五)导致债务人丧失清偿能力的其他情形。
    四、申请人向人民法院提出破产申请,人民法院未接收其申请,或者未按本规定第七条执行的,申请人可以向上一级人民法院提出破产申请。

关于实施《中华人民共和国知识产权海关保护条例》第九条和第十一条的规定有关事项的公告
 

发布单位:海关总署

发布文号: 海关总署公告2011年第59号

 

发布日期:2011-09-25

实施日期:2011-09-28

全文链接: http://www.customs.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab1/info318586.htm

    根据该公告:
    一、凡已经海关核准且属于《条例》第九条和第十一条第二款规定情形的知识产权海关保护备案(以下简称“备案”),海关总署有权予以撤销。
    二、知识产权海关保护的利害关系人根据《条例》第十一条的规定申请撤销备案的,应当向海关总署提交申请书。申请书应当有明确的申请人和被申请人、请求事项、基本事实和理由,并随附相关证明文件。

《民事诉讼法修正案》 公开征求意见

     载止2011年11月30日, 全国人大常委将《民事诉讼法修正案(草案)》及其说明(含修正前后对照表)在中国人大网公布,公开征集意见。此次修正的重点内容包括:
    一、完善当事人举证制度:
    1) 增加规定促使当事人积极提供证据
    2) 赋予当事人启动鉴定程序的权利
    二、完善起诉和受理程序、裁判文书公开等
    1) 完善开庭前准备程序
    2) 完善裁判文书公开制度
    3) 完善保全制度。
    三、完善简易程序
    1) 设立小额损失制度
    2) 扩大简易程序适用范围
    3) 进一步简化审理程序
    四、严惩据不执行。
    1)强化执行措施
    2)制裁逃避执行行为
    3)加大对拒不执行的惩罚力度。

 

联系我们

如您对通讯中的信息存在疑惑或欲获取更多信息,请联系我们。

   

您可通过我们的网站获取更多信息,也可通过Email和电话直接联系我们,我们非常荣幸为您提供更具针对性的专业法律意见和服务。

我们的网站地址:www.suzhoulegal.com  

   

我们的邮件地址:enquiries@suzhoulegal.com                                  

   

我们的电话:0512 69176008

   

 

订阅

若需获取以往刊物,请访问我们的网站:www.suzhoulegal.com

 

如果你不希望再订阅此刊物或者需更新您的电子邮件地址,请您联系我们:newsletter@suzhoulegal.com

 
   

法律声明

《苏州外企法律通讯》为Suzhoulegal团队编辑,未经书面许可任何内容不得转载、摘编。

 

关于苏州外资法律通讯的订阅与反馈说明、版权声明和免责声明,以及本所的联系方式等内容,详见本所的网站。

 

本资讯中所载信息仅作一般参考,在任何意义上不可视作律师向客户提供的法律意见或建议。

 
对于任何因信赖本资讯而采取的行动,我们不承担任何责任。  
www.suzhoulegal.com                                                                ©Copyright Suzhou Legal 2011     

电话:0512 69176008

Please click to visit Chinese Version Newsletter     

SuzhouLegal

 

                                       

建纬(苏州)律师事务所     

           

Newsletter 苏州外企法律通讯

     

CITY DEVELOPMENT (SUZHOU) LAW FIRM

                                                                                                     

WWW.SUZHOULEGAL.COM

         

      Please click here if the page can not show properly.

 

                             Issue 10,October 2011

 

Suzhoulegal Newsletter, a legal newsletter  published by Shanghai City Development (Suzhou) Law Firm, contains useful legal updates and information for foreign invested companies in Suzhou and greater areas.

 

 

SuzhouLegal is a branch of City Development Law Firm, Suzhou and specializes in providing services and assistance to foreign invested companies in the Suzhou and the surrounding areas. For detailed information about our services please visit our website www.suzhoulegal.com  We offer all subscribers to our Newsletter one free legal consultation with our foreign legal service team. To arrange this please contact one of our team by phone or email and we will be happy to make an appointment for you or visit you at your workplace.

  Featured Article
Enterprises to lay off
Legal Updates

Supreme People’s Court’s Provision (1) regarding the application of PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law

 

Announcement concerning the Implementation of Articles 9 and 11 of the PRC Intellectual Property Rights Protection Regulations

 

Proposed Amendments to Civil Procedure Law

 Featured Article

Enterprises to lay off
 

         In response to current economic climates, some of our clients have been expressing to our law firm their desires to learn more about relevant Chinese labor laws and regulations on employee layoffs. We think this topic might become more and more germane to other businesses in China; thus, we have dedicated this issue of our newsletter to address ways by which a company may implement workforce reduction.
        From our practice experiences, typically an employer has at least two legal options when considering work force reduction: (I) “economic downsizing” and (II) employment contract termination through mutual negotiation.
 

I. Economic Downsizing

        “Economic downsizing” is a term used in Chinese labor law to describe a situation where a company terminates a sizeable number of its employees. Specifically, relevant laws stipulate that a company may lay off at least 20 of its workers or 10% of its entire workforce (if the targeted layoff employees are less than 20 people) if (i) the company is experiencing severe difficulties in its production or business operations or (ii) there are major changes in the objective economic circumstances relied upon at the time of conclusion of the employment contracts, which has now rendered the employment contracts unperformable.

         If a company meets one of the two criteria stated, it must also fulfill the following requirements:
         (1) Explain layoff decision to labor union, if any, or entire workforce 30 days in advance and provide relevant production and operational data;
         (2) Prepare employee layoff proposal in which targeted employee, date of layoff and layoff implementation plan must be presented to labor union or entire workforce for discussion and input;
         (3) Report employee layoff proposal and employee feedbacks collected to SIP labor administrative department for approval;
         (4) After receiving approval from labor administrative department, company may lay off targeted employees with the payment of economic compensation (or severance payment) in accordance with applicable laws.

          With respect to economic compensation or severance pay, Chinese law requires that the amount of such payment shall be based on employees’ respective years of employment service, with compensation of one month salary for every full year worked at the company. (The monthly salary is determined as the average salary of each respective employee in the last 12 months prior to the layoff.)
         Also note that there are certain employees especially protected under labor law even during periods of business operational difficulties. In other words certain employees are protected against workforce reduction. Particularly, a company’s employment layoff plan must not include the following group of employees:
         (1) those engaged in operations exposing him to occupational disease hazards and has not undergone a pre-departure occupational health check-up, or is suspected of having contracted an occupational disease and is being diagnosed or under medical observation;
         (2) those who have been confirmed as having lost or partially lost his capacity to work due to an occupational disease contracted or a work-related injury sustained with the employer;
        (3) those who has contracted an illness or sustained a non-work-related injury, and the set period of medical care therefore has not expired;
       (4) female employee in her pregnancy, confinement or nursing period; and
       (5) those who have been working for the employer continuously for not less than 15 years and is less than 5 years away from his legal retirement age;

      Finally, priority must be given to the following employees to keep their positions:
       (1) those who have signed with the employer fixed-term employment contracts with a relatively long term;
       (2) those who have signed open-ended employment contracts with the employer; and
       (3) those who are the only ones in their families to be employed and whose families have an elderly person or a minor for whom they need to provide.

II) Work Force Reduction through Negotiation with Affected Employee

       Another approach to reduce company employees in the face of business slowdown is to negotiate individually or collectively with employees targeted for layoffs.
      If a company successfully negotiates with its employees to terminate existing labor contracts, the company shall pay severance or economic compensation to terminated employees; the actual amount would be based on mutual negotiations.
      However, challenges arise when employees chosen for layoff refuse to be terminated and a company cannot rely on any justifiable causes as grounds to unilaterally terminate employee contracts. In the face of this reality, if a company insists on laying off employees, the company risks triggering penalties contemplated under Chinese law which requires a 200% payment of regular severance as damage compensation.
      Thus, the worst scenario in a company’s plan to reduce workforce is that it does not quality for “economic downsizing”, that it cannot successfully negotiate to end employment contract with employees and that its unilateral decision to terminate is countered by employees exercising their rights to remain employees. Apart from this worst case, the next worst case hypothetical is that unilaterally terminated employees decide not to return to work but seeks damages equaling 200% of severance pay based on years of service.
      The table below summarizes the possible options available to a company contemplating workforce reduction and corresponding economic compensation (severance payment) or damages it may have to pay for exercising each option:

 

Company Options

Economic Compensation Company Must Pay

Damages Company Must Pay

Other Comments

1) Apply for economic downsizing

1 month salary for every 1 full year of service

Not Applicable

l   Application may not be approved and procedure may be time consuming  

2) Achieve negotiated labor contract termination

Not applicable as actual settlement as compensation varies depending upon outcome of negotiations

Not Applicable

l   Expected to pay higher compensation if employees refuse to accept initial settlement offer

3) Terminate employees unilaterally

Not Applicable

1 month salary for every 1 full year of service x 2

l   Employee has legal right to return to work if termination unlawful

 

       If a company is considering to layoff production line workers, sometimes there are other methods of reducing such workforce by, for example, completely eliminating their overtime work hours. For this particular group of employees, they depend heavily on overtime work and may leave a company voluntarily if overtime work is not available. On the contrary, the same tactic may not work as well for office staff.

Latest Legal Updates

 

Supreme People’s Court’s Provision (1) regarding the application of PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law

Issuing Department: Supreme People’s Court

Issue No.: Judicial Interpretation (2011) 22 Issue Date:2011-09-09 Implementation Date:2011-09-26  

Full Text Link:http://www.court.gov.cn/qwfb/sfjs/201109/t20110926_165692.htm

     

     Since the implementation of the PRC Enterprise Bankruptcy Law on June 1, 2007, some courts have not fully recognized the important purpose and factors played by enterprise bankruptcy law in moderating market economy. Courts have refused to accept legitimate enterprise bankruptcy applications for various reasons. Consequently, some enterprises have not been able to rely on statutory procedures in pulling out of the market and have seriously disrupted market economic order. To quickly correct this improper development and to implement the expected use of enterprise bankruptcy law, the Supreme People’s Court will initiate its efforts with the confines of the court system to encourage the acceptance of bankruptcy cases and make drafted the first judicial interpretation on enterprise bankruptcy law.
     The judicial interpretation further clarifies bankruptcy application standard and provide bankruptcy applicant the procedural recourse to access judicial review as follows:
    1. If a debtor cannot pay off its debts and meets one of the following situations, People’s Court shall find that the debtor meets bankruptcy requirements: its assets are insufficient to discharge all of its debts or if it clearly lacks the capacity to discharge such debts.
    2. People’s Court shall find that a debtor has lost its ability to pay off its debts as they come due if a debt relationship is established, has matured and debtor is unable to pay off the entire debt.
    3. Even if debtor’s assets are greater than its debts, a company will be deemed to “clearly lack the capacity to discharge all of its debts” if
    (1) there is severe cash flow shortage or company assets cannot readily be converted into cash;
    (2) its legal representative is missing and there is no other person available to manage company assets;
    (3) People’s Court’s judgment execution has caused company to lose the ability to pay off debts;
    (4) it has sustained long term business losses and will be difficult to reverse operating losses;
    (5) other circumstances leading to the debtor’s inability to pay off debts.
    4. If applicant’s bankruptcy application is not accepted by People’s Court pursuant to Article 7 of this Provision, applicant may apply to upper level court.
 

Announcement concerning the Implementation of Articles 9 and 11 of the PRC Intellectual Property Rights Protection Regulations

Issuing Department: General Administration of Customs

Issue No.:General Administration of Customs 2011 no. 59.

Issue Date: 2011-09-25

Implementation Date: 2011-09-28

Full Text Link:http://www.customs.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab1/info318586.htm

    According to the Announcement:
    1. For those that have already received Customs approval in accordance with Articles 9 and 11 of the PRC Intellectual Property Rights Protection Regulations (”Regulation”)with respect to Customs registration of intellectual property (“registration”), the General Administration Customs has the right to rescind such registration.
    2. Interested parties to Customs protection of intellectual property rights may apply (only in writing) to rescind registration in accordance with Article 11 of the Regulation. Application must indicate a clear applicant and respondent, specific request, basic facts, reasons and must also provide relevant documentation.

 

Proposed Amendments to Civil Procedure Law

   As of November 30, 2011, the National People’s Congress will make public at its website the proposed bill to Civil Procedural Law and corresponding explanation (including comparison of pre and post amendment) to seek public opinions. This amendment includes:
      1. Improve parties ability to proffer evidence
     (1) Enhance rules to allow parties to proactively provide evidence
     (2) Allow parties to initiate the right to examine and inspect evidence
      2. Improve litigation case acceptance procedures and openness of judgment
     (1) Improve preparatory procedures before trial
     (2) Improve system of accessibility to judgment
     (3) Improve preservation of evidence or property procedures
     3. Improve simplified procedure
     (1) Establish small claims litigation system
     (2) Expand applicability of simplified procedure
     (3) Further simplified adjudication process
     4. Severely punish court refusal to execute judgment
     (1) Strength judgment execution measure
     (2) Crackdown on non-execution actions
     (3)Increase severity of punishment against refusal to execute
 

 

CONTACT US

If you have any queries or wish to obtain more information about the content of our newsletter, please contact us.

   

It will be our pleasure to provide more specific and targeted professional legal opinion and services.

 

Our Website: www.suzhoulegal.com  

   

Our Email Address: enquiries@suzhoulegal.com                                  

   

Our Telephone Number: 0512 69176008

   

 

SUBSCRIPTIONS

For past issues please visit our website - www.suzhoulegal.com

     

If you wish to unsubscribe from the newsletter or update us with your latest contact details please email us - newsletter@suzhoulegal.com

 
   

DISCLAIMER

The SuzhouLegal Newsletter is compiled by the SuzhouLegal Team. Content may not be reproduced without written permission.

 

Please refer to our website for subscriptions, feedback, copyright statements and disclaimers of the newsletter and for the contact information of our firm.

Any information contained within this newsletter is intended to be used as general reference only and does not constitute a legal opinion between a lawyer and client under any circumstances.

The law firm is not responsible for any actions taken upon the advice contained within the newsletter.

   
www.suzhoulegal.com                                                                ©Copyright Suzhou Legal 2011     

电话:0512 69176008